Page history
29 January 2018
12 November 2017
3 December 2015
→Well I was going to rate this, but...: This spell's major shortcoming was always intended to be the fact that it works on a time delay. And the time delay is also its strength, by letting it work in conjunction with Time Stop.
+1,544
no edit summary
m+810
I did say it would only be a dislike without the tl;dr, and this is a step in the right direction.
m-924
→Ratings: Blocking the ratings based entirely on "TL;DR"
+54
→Well I was going to rate this, but...: I made some changes to the spell.
+1,986
no edit summary
m+698
→Well I was going to rate this, but...: The end-state thing isn't that complicated.
+556
no edit summary
m+28
no edit summary
m+537
→Well I was going to rate this, but...: Holy Hold has two separate saves for two separate end-states, but any given creature only has to make one or the other.
+874
2 December 2015
→Well I was going to rate this, but...: Well, logically, it should be possible to jump out of the ring. And the spell was designed from the ground up to work well with Time Stop.
+778
Added rating.
+194
More speeling, more grandma
m+47
Speeling.
m+1
Added rating.
+1,569
→Well I was going to rate this, but...
+2,789
→Well I was going to rate this, but...
+613
→Well I was going to rate this, but...
+157
→Well I was going to rate this, but...: This isn't as long as it seems to be.
+667
4 January 2015
19 August 2013
18 August 2013
31 July 2013
4 December 2012
→Time Stop Stupidity: Fixup
m-1
→Time Stop Stupidity: Holy hold is actually a delayed-effect spell itself.
+1,273
→Time Stop Stupidity
+276
→Time Stop Stupidity: Scrying phase?
+256
→Time Stop Stupidity
+160
→Time Stop Stupidity: I forgot my signature
m+94
→Time Stop Stupidity
+373
→Time Stop Stupidity
+329
→Time Stop Stupidity: The damage is high because it's SITUATIONAL.
+368
→Time Stop Stupidity
+190
→Time Stop Stupidity
+180
Two different topics
+846
