27,249
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:::Ideasmith, you are using mainly the argument that the explanation given in a splatbook isn't as valid as the core material since players can simply ignore it. Beside the merit of the point itself, you are arguing that on a homebrew wiki: to make content oriented to the maximum number of players isn't the goal of the site, because the use of an extensive homebrew wiki is even more niche than a splatbook (and who even plays 3.5e nowadays). So, for the public this is intended for, mostly wiki-users, and more generally those that are knowledgeable about the system, this is pretty straightforward content, being just a feat version of a prc concept. And even if someone doesn't know about the prc and finds this feat by chance, it should be a time to learn, not argue. --[[User:The bluez in the dungeon|The bluez in the dungeon]] ([[User talk:The bluez in the dungeon|talk]]) 21:26, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
:::: I think some material being vague can actually be somewhat helpful, at least within reason. It allows each group to make an individual decision on the material in question that isn't binding to other groups. In this case, what I wrote isn't at all vague. "You are able to cast conjuration (summoning) and conjuration (calling) spells with the [evil] descriptor without risking an alignment change and may cast such spells even if it would be prohibited by your alignment (such as being a cleric). You also do not commit any inherent evil act by consorting with evil creature you conjure, '''as long as you do not use their aid for an evil act, or further the goals of evil as payment.'''" The second sentence here should end any doubt that you can burn down an orphanage with an evil fire elemental.
:::: As far as the idiom I mixed a French and an English one. What I meant is splitting hairs. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 21:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
