9,988
edits
Changes
→Breadcrumb
:: If this is the case, then they should be evaluated as a package rather than as a singular scaling feat, for the same argument I made in IRC, though I'll repeat it here if anyone else is interested (casual, dumb, lowest derivative user, etc). If we don't have a disclaimer, it needs to be evaluated just like any other feat rather than on its own balance scale. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 05:44, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
:::Yes, that was the consensus view - evaluate as a package just like every other feat. I'm pretty sure that's what not having a different balance guideline means. Feel free to start balance arguments over whichever ones you want on their talk pages, change yours to what you think they are so we can argue about them on their talk pages, whatever. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 06:17, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
