User talk:XX the memenist Xx
Contents
Bring Back Cromthor[edit]
Seriously, that was the greatest name for a legendary hero, possibly in the history of all time. Spanambula (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
You see. Believe it or not, the original names of the first 6 legendary heroes are actually characters me and my group of friends have made and I am currently DMing ( I also control YipYap PayPiy) so I will change the names back
Incomplete Articles[edit]
I commented on this page on how to correctly format your articles. Hope that helps! --Ghostwheel (talk) 09:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Say it With Me: Sandboxes.[edit]
Your Warlord class has been in progress for a week now, and it's not even close to finished. Look, we all have stuff to do, but if you can't finish articles quickly, whether from inexperience or irl busyness, they belong in your sandbox. Others have told you how to make one, simply type /sandbox beside your username on your page, then click "Create" towards the top right of the screen when the wiki tells you there's no page with that name. Then just copypasta your stuff in there, and you have all the time in the world to work on things without getting annoyed messages from other users. Easy peasy.
The community here is happy to help you make your articles the best they can be, but this is a community, not the D&D version of photobucket where you just dump whatever you want on here for your own reference. We're happy to work with you, but you also have to work with us. Spanambula (talk) 00:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Stop Removing the Incomplete Tag[edit]
It disruptive and edit warring is of no help for you, me or anyone for that matter. Just finish the article instead and they will be removed. --Leziad (talk) 19:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Consider this your final warning. Cease removing the incomplete tag. It's there for a reason. If you have something that you're working on that isn't complete, put it in a user sandbox instead (this has been explained to you multiple times). Do not remove the incomplete tag. Surgo (talk) 01:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please stop removing the incomplete template from pages. I've blocked you for a day, and will do so again next time you remove an incomplete template before the page is complete. --Ghostwheel (talk) 18:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Rating Authored Articles[edit]
Please do not rate your own articles. This is not allowed under the rating system. Thank you. --Ghostwheel (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Please Understand[edit]
Incomplete articles cannot be rated, however if they are marked as complete they will be rated. This is how it work, do not remove the incomplete tag or mark as complete if your stuff is being worked on, no matter how large the disclaimer. You either mark the article as complete and be rated or keep the incomplete tag and have a time limit to finish until it sandboxed. You can't eat the cake and sell it too. --Leziad (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted your recent articles[edit]
I gave you until the end of the night to either sandbox them or finish them, and you have done neither, so I have deleted them as I said I would. You've been informed multiple times about wiki rules and sandboxing instead of placing incomplete articles in the main namespace. From here on out, any article that you post that is incomplete and not in a sandbox will be immediately deleted. Surgo (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Subpages in Sourcebooks[edit]
You did it a bit wrong. How you want to do it is like so:
[[/Rapier FE|Rapier]]
Notice how there's a slash before the wiki name? That way it becomes a subpage of the current page. So you have all weapons under the weapon page, rather than under the main sourcebook itself. Also makes it so you don't have hugelong filenames that all need to be changed, since the above will move along with the page when it's moved, while the way you did it currently means that you'll have to change them all manually if you move the page to the mainspace. --Ghostwheel (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
