Talk:Magic Missile Battery (3.5e Spell)
Ratings[edit]
|
Luigifan18 likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Okay, this is just amazing. You took an already spam-friendly spell and made it even spam-friendlier. |
I like this spell and would love to use it... But I'm wondering if that's not a little too much dakka for its level? -HarrowedMind (talk) 02:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well you won't get any more than 5d4+5 a round, like normal magic missile. The at will shouldn't be an issue at 5th level and beyond, you usually have better things to cast by then, making this your accurate but weak ranged backup weapon. Think of this akin to a reserve feat. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 02:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- I can't help but realize the compairison of wizard vs warlock... at lvl 5, wizard gets 3d4+3 vs warlocks 3d6 +any invocation it's pretty even. and as a DM I'll never worry about it because it's easy to dispel... on a side note, it brilliantly fills in the balance between wizards and warlocks.--Snafusam (talk) 18:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Force Immunity[edit]
So, this grants immunity to force spells of 2nd level or lower. Fair enough. But I have to ask how specific you meant for it to be. I think you meant for it to apply to force damage (and modified the page as such), but I'm not sure how specific you want this to be in terms of, for lack of a better word, effect classes. By this, I mean to ask if you only want this to block force spells of 2nd level or lower, or if you also want it to apply to other things that use levels similarly to how spells do, like powers and maneuvers. Or, heck, if you want it to apply to things that don't even have spell levels, like, say, soulmelds and combat surges. If it blocks surges, then okay, it blocks a Surge of Force from a surge fighter of 4th or lower level. If it blocks soulmelds, it would block, say, soulmelds bound to or occupying a least chakra, or soulmelds from a meldshaper with a meldshaper level lower than 4th. The point is, basically, I'd like to know what this does and doesn't apply to. --Luigifan18 (talk) 19:09, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
