Talk:Fusion Dance (3.5e Invocation)

Ratings

	Franken Kesey likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
	This is a fun spell ankin to irresistible dance, but to a willing creature. You closed a lot of possible loop-holes and fully explained all the mechanics of this spell.

Length

In retrospect this is really too long for what looks like a variation of fusion. Can we compress this somehow? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 06:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

I do agree that it is pretty crazy long. However, this spell has several major differences from the SRD version. For starters characters that use Fusion Dance are stronger than SRD characters. Secondly there are no rules for the base outfit of a creature that doesn't choose to use one of the base creatures armors, as where this one gives a really great armor if the fused being doesn't use one of the base creatures armors. Also theres the whole "failed fusions" thing which while technically a detriment is actually apart of the lore and flavor of the series, so I don't want to lose that.

So my spell has to do and say basically everything that the SRD says, but then convey several other things as well which is what lends to the length of the article. If anyone current or even years and years from now can come up with a more condensed way to word things BUT STILL CONVEY THE SAME CONCEPT WITHOUT LOSING *ANY* OF THE FLAVOR then I fully approve any edits from others on this article. The-Marksman (talk) 21:42, 16 November 2017 (MST)

Level 1?

Why such a large difference in spell levels?

More to the point, the fusion dance never seemed like a low level easy trick, it seems a high level trick to me. -- Eiji-kun 09:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Emphasis bump. -- Eiji-kun 05:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Bump again. -- Eiji-kun 04:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

On a related note, and even more strangely, neither the saiyan warrior nor the ki warrior seems to have any spell list.--Ideasmith (talk) 02:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Or any spellcasting ability, for that matter.--Ideasmith (talk) 02:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I guess technically since they dont have a spell list I should remove them, since they technically get it as a SLA. Ty for noting it. The-Marksman (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome.--Ideasmith (talk) 21:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)