Ratings[edit]
|
MisterSinister favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| Excellent. Throwing weapon users take it in the earhole enough - this goes a long way to remedying that.
|
|
|
Foxwarrior favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| Yup, fighting with multiple throwing weapons without this item is a bad idea.
|
|
|
Leziad favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| I agree with the others.
|
|
|
DanielDraco favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| Perfect. Elegantly makes thrown weapons less suck.
|
|
|
Tarkisflux favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| This is a fantastic item. It's great for throwers in general, but it also allows them in an attuned item style game without arguments over how many attunement slots you use up for your full attack routine.
|
|
|
Eiji-kun favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| Why didn't I think of this? Filling a need, just what the plushie ordered.
|
|
|
The Dire Reverend favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| This fixes the problem I have with throwing weapons. I like it.
|
|
|
Idkwhatmynameis favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
|
| Weapon throwing is probably one of the coolest fighting styles in DnD, and this lets me do it without having to worry too much.
|
Capacity[edit]
You specify that it can hold 20 light thrown weapons, but there's nothing actually stopping someone from putting other stuff in there. I'd suggest altering it so that it has extradimensional storage, but only for mwk thrown weapons -- other items simply go into the physical space of the pouch, which has the same capacity as a normal pouch. It's a fiddly little detail, but exactly the sort of thing players and DMs get into stupid arguments about. --DanielDraco (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Rating as a Contributor?[edit]
Can I rate this since I'm not the author? Or am I barred from doing so since I'm a contributor? --Ghostwheel (talk) 15:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- We let contributors to larger projects rate the project, but this is small enough that line is harder to draw. You're not a co-author though, so it's probably fine. Contributor credit is often given for inspiration or random discussion bits after all, and those shouldn't disqualify you from rating. If you're sufficiently far from the project to rate it you probably don't need to be listed in the fave blurb though, so I'd probably pull that. - Tarkisflux Talk 16:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Eh, I think I was pretty instrumental in the final product (I didn't even realize a coauthor option existed), so I think leaving it as-is is fine. --Ghostwheel (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, you can replace "|contributors" with "|co-authors" to get the alternate credit assignment. Or Havvy can I guess. - Tarkisflux Talk 17:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Weird Special[edit]
Why is there an exception to the epic item rule up to 202,000 gp for this item? It doesn't seem too consequential, but it seems like it might simply be an artifact from a previous version of this article.
Yeah, just ignore me... It's the teleportation effect. --Maninorange (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
