Talk:Bender of Energy (3.5e Prestige Class)

Ratings

	Zhenra-Khal likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
	Done well, if powerful. May use in my campaigns.

	The-Marksman is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
	I love the idea and its well done and well written, but this shouldn't be a 1 level class. This should be a feat with lots of pre-reqs. If this later gets moved to a feat/power/spell this rating can be changed to like.

	Luigifan18 dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	It's a 1-level class. What.

	Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	Permanently crippling characters is not good. Sucking at it is worse.

Five simultaneous wishes or miracles doesn't sound permanent to me. It should not be sucking at it any more, though. --Foxwarrior (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Amon

So I once/if we learn more about Amon from The Legend of Korra, would the prerequisites (and possibly the penalty to evil characters) change for this class? The Dire Reverend 16:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

I should start watching that soon, huh. But I did include a DC 30 Bluff check in there, so I have at least one base covered. I could make it Lawful/Chaotic instead of Evil/Good, but I'm not sure which one would be supposed to be better. --Foxwarrior 20:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

My money's on there being another spirit who happens to know a very similar trick. Possibly that one who steals faces. --Foxwarrior 09:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Turns out I was wrong. Appropriate changes have been made here and elsewhere. --Foxwarrior (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

One Level Class

Wat? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 23:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

You can't put entry requirements on a feat. --Foxwarrior (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Feat? Wat x2? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 03:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

If it were a feat, it could not have these entry requirements. --Foxwarrior (talk) 03:28, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

And why not? Feats have pre-reqs. Nothing unusual about the pre-reqs that couldn't be done as a feat. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 03:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Eiji. You can put as many pre-reqs on feats as you want. This would be much better served as a feat / power / spell / invocation / maneuver / alternate class feature / etc. The-Marksman (talk) 06:32, 25 January 2018 (MST)