4,029
edits
Changes
→Rating
#There is no evidence of white-supremacy propaganda on this article (or the like). Do not see how this could ever be offensive. Think you mean to state that there are some mechanical issues with the article. Say a player starts with this class, expecting to play a short campaign. After a few months the campaign, turns out to last longer than expected, and he/she has reached 6th level. Now what? Become a level 1 fighter and gain a feat? Or rank in barbarian and gain rage 1/day? Both options do not compete with a rogue with sneak attack or a monk with flurry of blows and unarmed damage. Not only based on the weaker features, but more importantly because the avalanche knight has to start at level one in a new class at 6th level.
#As always, willing to work with an author (or adapter) on making an article better. That does not mean that any article is invulnerable to mechanical errors or discussion. If you fix some of the issues willing to change rating, but right now this article continues to have mechanical problems.--Franken Kesey 16:02, 1 May 2019 (MDT)
::Base classes can have 5 levels. That is fine. If you don't like that, too bad. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] ([[User talk:Surgo|talk]]) 16:32, 1 May 2019 (MDT)
:::# I have stewardship of the article, but prefer not to change it unless something is broken beyond playability, which has thus far been farther from a problem than you are from being on my good side.
:::# There is no problem with 5 or 10 level classes beyond the possibility of needing more levels to expand upon an idea, or having too many abilities cramped into too few levels. This has neither. Shooting down an entire group of articles because they don't fit into your little box is considered prejudiced and offensive, not fair, though it seems to be your kink, what with the "religious articles" thing a little while back. It's similar to being against an entire group of people for no reason other than they are the way they are, though the offense in this case is by far less severe.
::;# I? Never mentioned any propaganda? But with the way you're going out of your way to shit on most, if not all, of this type of article simply because they are of this type suggests you are butthurt over something related to them, since you were butthurt over your Satanist when you went on the downvoting rampage through Clericville. So I'm just going to assume you're butthurt now as you were then. Leopards and spots, all that.
:::#Prestige classes are a thing. They don't have to start out a new base class at level 6 if they don't want to; If they're using homebrew from this wiki, as they obviously are if they're using this class, they can pick from the plethora of PrCs that have requirements less than level 6.
:::# I don't foresee needing, nor recall requesting, your help in balancing the article. I'd had some concerns of my own, like the auto-hit bag-of-rats nonsense, but those I will address in my own due time, not when you get a bug up your rear and decide for me that I need to conform to WotC bullshit. We're homebrewers; We break the molds and make new ones, sometimes from the parts of the old ones. If you want conformism, flee.
:::As for how I plan to balance this class, my main concern is the cascade. It hits automatically and seems to be able to go outside your reach, as well as stacking with Cleave. While I enjoy being able to be a blender, autohits and reach-ignoring is silly. So, I'm going to implement a couple of things to counter this. In the meanwhile, find better things to do with my time and to masturbate to. --[[User:Zhenra-Khal|Zhenra-Khal]] ([[User talk:Zhenra-Khal|talk]]) 16:53, 1 May 2019 (MDT)
== Avalanche Knight, Master of the Rat on a Stick fighting school ==
