Changes

:::As for classes, it's not so much that the class table is hard (because level, proficiency, features is super easy), it's that sometimes there are classes that have things between proficiency and features, and then have progressions after features and maybe spells after that (as you mention in your examples). The easy way to support those is to simply let people deal with table formatting on their own, but I want to meet them halfway because usability. And after doing the very nuts partial caster subclass table, I think I have a good idea of how to do it. It's certainly a pretty low priority, but since races, subraces, subclasses, feats, backgrounds, spells, and variant rules are all done(ish) now, it's next on the list. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] ^{[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]} 05:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)