9,988
edits
Changes
→Prereqs: moar words
:Well, the effects you're dealing with can screw you over at any level, so I'm not seeing the real temptation in making an arbitrary BAB cap at all. As mentioned on the IRC, the BAB cap is a way to prevent full casters from getting access to it as easily, but Spell Parry requires an attack roll against an AC that can be missed even by someone with full BAB, and Spellcutting Strike is a standard action which can reasonably be replicated by preparing ''(greater) dispel magic'' and/or ''disintegrate'', so it's not likely to be particularly enticing to casters in the first place. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] 08:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
::If you're worried about the "no, you" aspect of it, tweak the effect down a bit. Instead of ending the effect entirely, set it up so that it just dispels the effect in one space. So you can carve tunnels through a wall of wind/ice/force and clean spaces in a grease patch, but you're just making a path through it and not a ending the entire effect. Maybe drop it to an attack action to make up for the reduced effect.
::If you're worried As for prereqs, I have my own concerns about the "noWitch Slayer (getting there), you" aspect but I wouldn't think a BAB of +5 or +6 prereq out of it, tweak line here. That gives the effect down full casters a bitcouple of levels to do control stuff before they need to do different control stuff to deal with this counter. Instead of ending the effect entirelyAs Fox points out though, set it up so that it just dispels the effect in one space. So you can carve tunnels through a wall of wind/ice/force and clean spaces in a grease patch, but could probably even get away with no bab cap at all if you're just making a path through it and not a ending the entire effect. Maybe drop it to an attack action to make up for the reduced effectwanted. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 21:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
