Talk:3.5e Scaling Feats

Breadcrumb

Was it changed? I don't see the disclaimer about these being more powerful than other feats anymore. --Ghostwheel 01:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

It was removed, as was the note on the article balance page and the note on the scaling feat page. After discussion the consensus was that a different balance guideline wasn't something people wanted to do. They wanted them separated still, for a reason that's not entirely clear to me, but they're subject to the same balance guidelines as every other feat. In short, I lost the round, and it's back to business as usual (mostly). - Tarkisflux ^Talk 02:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is the case, then they should be evaluated as a package rather than as a singular scaling feat, for the same argument I made in IRC, though I'll repeat it here if anyone else is interested (casual, dumb, lowest derivative user, etc). If we don't have a disclaimer, it needs to be evaluated just like any other feat rather than on its own balance scale. --Ghostwheel 05:44, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that was the consensus view - evaluate as a package just like every other feat. I'm pretty sure that's what not having a different balance guideline means. Feel free to start balance arguments over whichever ones you want on their talk pages, change yours to what you think they are so we can argue about them on their talk pages, whatever. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 06:17, 28 July 2012 (UTC)