Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sublime Mageblade (3.5e Prestige Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (→Slightly incoherent prerequisite-feature correspondence) |
Undead Knave (talk | contribs) (→Slightly incoherent prerequisite-feature correspondence) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The initiating progression for this class assumes that the character took a level in an initiating class before taking this class, but the prerequisite only lists "capable of initiating 1st level maneuvers", a prerequisite satisfied by the Martial Study feat. The result is it's hard to tell what this is supposed to do - in the ToB this isn't an issue because initiator PrCs just give maneuvers and stances to a character straight up rather than using any basis in a base class. Should something like that be used instead? Or should the class simply require that you actually have, for instance, a recovery mechanic so as to confirm that they have a class to advance? | The initiating progression for this class assumes that the character took a level in an initiating class before taking this class, but the prerequisite only lists "capable of initiating 1st level maneuvers", a prerequisite satisfied by the Martial Study feat. The result is it's hard to tell what this is supposed to do - in the ToB this isn't an issue because initiator PrCs just give maneuvers and stances to a character straight up rather than using any basis in a base class. Should something like that be used instead? Or should the class simply require that you actually have, for instance, a recovery mechanic so as to confirm that they have a class to advance? | ||
[[User:Sunwitch|Sunwitch]] ([[User talk:Sunwitch|talk]]) 01:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC) | [[User:Sunwitch|Sunwitch]] ([[User talk:Sunwitch|talk]]) 01:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Nah, that happens sometimes. Likewise having an SLA qualifies you for some casting PrCs, but you don't advance them really at all. That kind of thing happens sometimes. --[[User:Undead Knave|Undead_Knave]] ([[User talk:Undead Knave|talk]]) 04:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:47, 1 December 2021
Slightly incoherent prerequisite-feature correspondence[edit]
The initiating progression for this class assumes that the character took a level in an initiating class before taking this class, but the prerequisite only lists "capable of initiating 1st level maneuvers", a prerequisite satisfied by the Martial Study feat. The result is it's hard to tell what this is supposed to do - in the ToB this isn't an issue because initiator PrCs just give maneuvers and stances to a character straight up rather than using any basis in a base class. Should something like that be used instead? Or should the class simply require that you actually have, for instance, a recovery mechanic so as to confirm that they have a class to advance? Sunwitch (talk) 01:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nah, that happens sometimes. Likewise having an SLA qualifies you for some casting PrCs, but you don't advance them really at all. That kind of thing happens sometimes. --Undead_Knave (talk) 04:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
