Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feat Purchasing (3.5e Variant Rule)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I agree actually. Mind you, I didn't make this, this is old work from an author long forgotten. Since my wording is off today, wanna ive a short at rewording it? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji Hyrule]] 23:46, April 29, 2010 (UTC) | :::I agree actually. Mind you, I didn't make this, this is old work from an author long forgotten. Since my wording is off today, wanna ive a short at rewording it? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji Hyrule]] 23:46, April 29, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::OK. You can has reword. - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 01:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:18, 30 April 2010
so if feat training is not a class skill, you can only put in 1/2 ranks, meaning that it will cost 6 skill points for the bonus feat 173.33.2.57 15:46, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Yep. -- Eiji Hyrule 21:54, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- If it takes 6 skill points to get a bonus feat, and you're going to spend 6 skill points whether it be class or cross-class, and ranks don't matter at all... wait, why are you making it a cross class for everyone? Why not just make this a class skill for everyone where you get a new feat every 6 ranks and save people from doing division and having arguments about feats or class abilities that give people new class skills not applying to this one (because it already would be a class skill)? Why the extra layer of complication? - TarkisFlux 23:22, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree actually. Mind you, I didn't make this, this is old work from an author long forgotten. Since my wording is off today, wanna ive a short at rewording it? -- Eiji Hyrule 23:46, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- OK. You can has reword. - TarkisFlux 01:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
