Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sage Wizard (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: That be odd. DM: So you take MT, what your arcane class? Player: Wizard. DM: Ok, what your divine? Player: Wizard! DM: Wait what? --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 09:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC) | : That be odd. DM: So you take MT, what your arcane class? Player: Wizard. DM: Ok, what your divine? Player: Wizard! DM: Wait what? --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 09:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Technically, but it would do you no good because, well, because what Leziad said. I don't worry about it since the arcane counts as divine and vice versa thing was already possible, and didn't break anything open via a vis Prestige Classes. The Wis only applies to Wizard spells, though it remains for skill point use. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Unless you were asking "should psions, warlocks, etc also have a similar ACF". In which case, sure, it should be possible. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 09:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:53, 20 March 2015
Could this fulfill the prereqs for MT on its own? Also, how does an ACF for a base class have a prereq? Finally, should all mental ability scores be able to be used for all classes that use a specific one? (Int-based wilders, Cha-based wizards, Wis-based psions, Int-based warlocks, etc?) --Ghostwheel (talk) 09:32, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- That be odd. DM: So you take MT, what your arcane class? Player: Wizard. DM: Ok, what your divine? Player: Wizard! DM: Wait what? --Leziad (talk) 09:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Technically, but it would do you no good because, well, because what Leziad said. I don't worry about it since the arcane counts as divine and vice versa thing was already possible, and didn't break anything open via a vis Prestige Classes. The Wis only applies to Wizard spells, though it remains for skill point use.