Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rabbit (3.5e Monster)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(added a comment) |
m (→Lagomorph) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Rabbits, even magical ones, are not rodents. They're lagomorphs, a much cooler word. You're now remembering that one spell/status in FF6 called Lagomorph that had a rabbit show up. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] ([[User talk:Ganteka Future|talk]]) 17:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | Rabbits, even magical ones, are not rodents. They're lagomorphs, a much cooler word. You're now remembering that one spell/status in FF6 called Lagomorph that had a rabbit show up. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] ([[User talk:Ganteka Future|talk]]) 17:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Lagomorphs are direct siblings of rodents. The distinction in common vernacular isn't really useful. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] ([[User talk:Aarnott|talk]]) 17:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:31, 18 March 2014
Lagomorph
Rabbits, even magical ones, are not rodents. They're lagomorphs, a much cooler word. You're now remembering that one spell/status in FF6 called Lagomorph that had a rabbit show up. --Ganteka Future (talk) 17:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
