Talk:Two-Weapon Fighter (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)

Ratings

Sulacu is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.

While two-weapon fighting is undoubtably useful, this is effectively trading two feats (Armor Proficiency (medium) and Armor Proficiency (heavy)) for one (Two-Weapon Fighting). Furthermore, I don't really see ignoring Dexterity requirements as very useful considering that, having relinquished the defenses of both heavy armors and shields you would have a high Dexterity bonus to offset the drop in defense in the first place. Basically, I don't think this is any more effective than taking Two-Weapon Fighting as one of your fighter bonus feats.

Two-Weapon Fighting is slightly more useful than Armor Prof, also the ignoring prerequisite simply echoes what the ranger does. It one less feat to take if you want to make a fighter that use light armor and two weapons. --Leziad (talk) 10:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps, but as far as ACFs go this does extremely little. If it would do a little more, it would be better. Perhaps, give access to the full Two-Weapon Fighting tree over time. But as it stands, it takes away one of a fighter's very few strengths - the easy access to high AC it needs to be a damage sponge - and receives in return something it could just as easily gain by expending one of its ten bonus feats. --Sulacu (talk) 11:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)