Talk:Spellbane (3.5e Class)
Contents
Ratings[edit]
|
Phil Umbras favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| This class provides an interesting mixed bag of abilities that a creative player can use to make a game interesting. |
This class should now be considered complete. Somehownotsingle (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Balance[edit]
I feel like this class is sort of between moderate and high. Am I right about that? If so, would giving it full BAB go ahead and bump it up to high? Any thoughts on this at all?Somehownotsingle (talk) 03:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
I went ahead and gave it full BAB and made it high. Let me know what you think about the move.Somehownotsingle (talk) 18:25, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- I feel like this class fits in more with a Moderate playstyle. --Foxwarrior (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I'll change it back to moderate.Somehownotsingle (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Balance Revisited[edit]
Okay, I gave the Spellbane a few more abilities that I think might bump it up to High. I'm not necessarily going for a particular rating, but I want to make sure I accurately classify the class I created. Somehownotsingle (talk) 01:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, made additional changes to the class, and I think I'm done for now (except for maybe the minor edit here or there). The Further Training, in particular, got a pretty huge overhaul to make it more appropriate for the warrior-scholar theme, instead of the somewhat random hodge podge of abilities that it used to be.Somehownotsingle (talk) 07:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Played?[edit]
I noticed a lot of hits for this class, so I was wondering if anyone has used it in a game yet. If so, I would love some feedback about what worked/didn't work, what you liked/didn't like, etc. Or, if you adopted the class (or any part of it), I would love to know that, too. Basically, I'm looking for any feedback from people who have field tested this class, or aspects of it. Thanks!Somehownotsingle (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
