Talk:Vampire Hunter (3.5e Feat)

RatingsEdit

	Fluffykittens dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	Mixture of moderate to wizard level abilities with an undefined term "true death" thrown in.

Eiji-kun dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.

0: Looks ok. 1: I don't like that mundane Disguise is useless, nor that magical disguises work but are defeated by a set DC. 6: Vampires have DR/wood now? Whatever, it's not so bad I suppos... 11: WIZARD PISSES IN YOUR FEAT. 25% chance your BBEG is just gone each round, cause the rapier user was feeling cheeky. 16: Why the nausea triggers on the use of certain abilities is a mystery... And it says it's High, huh? No sir, I don't like it.

Foxwarrior is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.

The problem is that the lower and upper limits on the fraction of opponents you fight who are [Unliving] are "none" and "all", respectively, and controlled by the DM without any real guidelines on that point. I suppose that if you knew you were going to be playing in a Vampire Hunter/Vampire Assassination Politics campaign, this feat would be a valid and reasonable choice, but then it's still just a moderate boost to identification and kill speed, not particularly exciting.

	Ghostwheel likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
	While I disagree with some of the abilities gotten, I do like the design principles behind this feat, allowing you to specialize in something that doesn't normally have to fit within the general things encompassed by most classes.

+11 AbilityEdit

What about if instead upon striking a vampire with a melee attack, they are treated as being exposed to sunlight for 1 round?--Dragonexx (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2017 (MST)