Difference between revisions of "Talk:Master Craftsman (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '== Balance == I'd say this is either wizard-level (craft ANYTHING) or unquantifiable (depends on what you craft, how much time the DM gives you to craft, etc)... Probably the la…')
 
(Balance)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I'd say this is either wizard-level (craft ANYTHING) or unquantifiable (depends on what you craft, how much time the DM gives you to craft, etc)... Probably the latter. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 20:56, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
 
I'd say this is either wizard-level (craft ANYTHING) or unquantifiable (depends on what you craft, how much time the DM gives you to craft, etc)... Probably the latter. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 20:56, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:With you on the unquant. Items are a... mixed bag of very awesome and semi-required for certain games and very not worth it tied together with some easily exploitable, slightly played down crafting rules. If you've closed some obvious loopholes this isn't that bad, but as that treads into houserule and playstyle land it's hard to pin down. I like it though, it's a fair scaling skill feat that makes investing in Craft skills not worthless. - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 22:17, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:17, 24 February 2010

Balance[edit]

I'd say this is either wizard-level (craft ANYTHING) or unquantifiable (depends on what you craft, how much time the DM gives you to craft, etc)... Probably the latter. --Ghostwheel 20:56, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

With you on the unquant. Items are a... mixed bag of very awesome and semi-required for certain games and very not worth it tied together with some easily exploitable, slightly played down crafting rules. If you've closed some obvious loopholes this isn't that bad, but as that treads into houserule and playstyle land it's hard to pin down. I like it though, it's a fair scaling skill feat that makes investing in Craft skills not worthless. - TarkisFlux 22:17, February 24, 2010 (UTC)