Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unworthy (3.5e Prestige Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
(Added rating.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
+ | {{Rating |rater=Sunwitch | ||
+ | |rating=oppose | ||
+ | |reason=Breaking the RNG and playing against fundamental rules of the game isn't balanced out by telling the DM it's okay to make up stuff that keeps them from doing that - that's just an admission that the abilities you gave the class aren't appropriate. | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
|rating=dislike | |rating=dislike | ||
|reason=The idea of willingly swearing subservience to another character is refreshing, but the DM Note in italics and the numerically extreme but otherwise fairly uninspired class features are unpleasant. | |reason=The idea of willingly swearing subservience to another character is refreshing, but the DM Note in italics and the numerically extreme but otherwise fairly uninspired class features are unpleasant. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 07:33, 16 July 2021
Ratings[edit]
Sunwitch opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
Breaking the RNG and playing against fundamental rules of the game isn't balanced out by telling the DM it's okay to make up stuff that keeps them from doing that - that's just an admission that the abilities you gave the class aren't appropriate. |
Foxwarrior dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. | |
---|---|
The idea of willingly swearing subservience to another character is refreshing, but the DM Note in italics and the numerically extreme but otherwise fairly uninspired class features are unpleasant. |