Difference between revisions of "SRD talk:Feats"
(→Other Stuff) |
m (→Fighter feats marked as General feats or just Epic feats) |
||
| Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
| − | === Fighter feats marked as General feats | + | === Fighter feats marked as General feats and not as Fighter Feats === |
'''Column 1''' | '''Column 1''' | ||
Revision as of 17:28, 12 August 2019
Some of these feats, such as Psionic Talent, have an odd formatting. Is this intentional? --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 19:37, 11 August 2019 (MDT)
- I don't know if it's intentional; but Psionic Talent (as you pointed out) doesn't use the 3.5e Feat template, which is why it looks weirds. You can see the difference by checking the source on something like Ability Focus. We'll probably fix this. Thanks for pointing this out, my dude. --TK-Squared (talk) 02:52, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
- No problem. It also looks like some fighter feats are missing the blurb about the fighter being able to take it as a bonus feat (unless Flyby Attack really isn't a bonus fighter feat) or are labeled as general feats and not fighter feats (some fighter feats have the fighter category and not the general category, idk if that was an actual feat category in the SRD or not). --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 05:42, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
Contents
List of Incorrectly Labeled and/or Templated Feats
Here's the list of all feats that have a bad template, aren't correct with 3.0 being updated to 3.5, and/or are fighter bonus feats that are not marked as in the fighter feat category on their article page. --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
Wrong/Incorrect Template
Column 1
SRD:Blind-Fight (missing new line before fighter feat text)
SRD:Disguise Spell ("Music" feat category error)
Column 2
SRD:Penetrate Damage Reduction
Column 3
SRD:Spell Mastery (link to feat category page that doesn't exist)
SRD:Epic Weapon Focus (not sure if this is a bonus epic fighter feat or not)
Feats that have inaccurate information or are from 3.0 and not 3.5
Column 1
SRD:Knock-Down (This is a 3.0 feat. It wasn't carried over into 3.5. I'm not sure if that's a problem exactly, but maybe it should say that somewhere?)
Column 3
SRD:Two-Weapon Rend (epic in 3.0, was made general/fighter in 3.5's Player's Handbook II. It should at least be marked somehow as 3.0 content and that there's another feat of the same name in another book, unless if they said TWR is open game content in PH2.)
Fighter feats marked as General feats and not as Fighter Feats
Column 1
- SRD:Shot on the Run (also should this be listed as a feat building off of SRD:Point Blank Shot instead?)
Column 2
Column 3
SRD:Weapon Focus (and all feats in this feat tree)
Other Stuff
I put SRD: in front of each feat so the link works correctly without having to type every feat name twice. If someone ever decides to make redirects for all the feats, they could use this list and CTRL+H away the SRD: text and look at the preview to see which ones don't have redirects to the feat page. There are redirects for some feats, but not all of them, which is understandable for ones that probably don't get used much.--MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
I think Colossal Wild Shape should be listed as a feat under Gargantuan Wild Shape unless if there's another way to wild shape into a gargantuan creature. --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
Would it be helpful if there was also a "required for" column for each feat that's used as a requirement for other feats, to help in cases like Shot on the Run where it requires feats from different feat trees? --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:27, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
