Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dualist (3.5e Prestige Class)"
(→Formatting: new section) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I think he actually did mean "dualist". It is supposed to be a dual-weapon fighter. Whether or not that is the correct name, however... --[[User:Aarnott|Andrew Arnott]] ([[User Talk:Aarnott|talk]], [[Special:EmailUser/Aarnott|email]]) 02:56, September 10, 2009 (UTC) | :I think he actually did mean "dualist". It is supposed to be a dual-weapon fighter. Whether or not that is the correct name, however... --[[User:Aarnott|Andrew Arnott]] ([[User Talk:Aarnott|talk]], [[Special:EmailUser/Aarnott|email]]) 02:56, September 10, 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::So he does...I guess I should read the title. Heh. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] 02:59, September 10, 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Formatting == | == Formatting == | ||
One more thing, these pages should really be formatted like the rest of the class pages to look uniform. No worries though, I'll take care of that (I'll also upload the picture to the wiki, you shouldn't be subject to Photobucket's bandwidth limitations here). [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] 02:58, September 10, 2009 (UTC) | One more thing, these pages should really be formatted like the rest of the class pages to look uniform. No worries though, I'll take care of that (I'll also upload the picture to the wiki, you shouldn't be subject to Photobucket's bandwidth limitations here). [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] 02:58, September 10, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:59, 10 September 2009
Dualism
Just a quick comment to start (before I even read further). Dualism should give a bonus feat from a list and say that they must meet the prerequisites. That is much less wordy. --Andrew Arnott (talk, email) 02:48, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
Feint
What's the point of the ability that grants a somewhat improved feinting? Feinting doesn't really do anything for this class. I mean, being denied your dex bonus is useful, but the Dualist (I think you mean "Duelist" by the way, dualism is something a bit different) doesn't really get anything out of the deal. Surgo 02:54, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- I think he actually did mean "dualist". It is supposed to be a dual-weapon fighter. Whether or not that is the correct name, however... --Andrew Arnott (talk, email) 02:56, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- So he does...I guess I should read the title. Heh. Surgo 02:59, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
Formatting
One more thing, these pages should really be formatted like the rest of the class pages to look uniform. No worries though, I'll take care of that (I'll also upload the picture to the wiki, you shouldn't be subject to Photobucket's bandwidth limitations here). Surgo 02:58, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
