Difference between revisions of "Talk:Long Halberd (3.5e Equipment)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
HarrowedMind (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I never realized that D&D's halberds didn't have reach? We've always played as if it had it in my games... Kinda sucks. It's more of a pollaxe, really. ( And as always, the we...") |
HarrowedMind (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | I never realized that D&D's halberds didn't have reach? We've always played as if it had it in my games... Kinda sucks. It's more of a pollaxe, really. ( And as always, the weights are kind of exagerrated) [[User:HarrowedMind|-HarrowedMind]] ([[User talk:HarrowedMind|talk]]) 04:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | + | I never realized that D&D's halberds didn't have reach? We've always played as if it had it in my games... Kinda sucks per RAW. It's more of a pollaxe, really. ( And as always, the weights are kind of exagerrated) [[User:HarrowedMind|-HarrowedMind]] ([[User talk:HarrowedMind|talk]]) 04:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:47, 19 January 2014
I never realized that D&D's halberds didn't have reach? We've always played as if it had it in my games... Kinda sucks per RAW. It's more of a pollaxe, really. ( And as always, the weights are kind of exagerrated) -HarrowedMind (talk) 04:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)