Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hero Worshiper (3.5e Class)"
(→Formatting Issue) |
(→Played?: new section) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::: One does not simply ignore a ThunderGod ...[[User:Somehownotsingle|Somehownotsingle]] ([[User talk:Somehownotsingle|talk]]) 20:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | ::: One does not simply ignore a ThunderGod ...[[User:Somehownotsingle|Somehownotsingle]] ([[User talk:Somehownotsingle|talk]]) 20:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Played? == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I noticed a lot of hits for this class, so I was wondering if anyone has used it in a game yet. If so, I would love some feedback about what worked/didn't work, what you liked/didn't like, etc. Or, if you adopted the class (or any part of it), I would love to know that, too. Basically, I'm looking for any feedback from people who have field tested this class, or aspects of it. Thanks![[User:Somehownotsingle|Somehownotsingle]] ([[User talk:Somehownotsingle|talk]]) 21:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:24, 14 December 2013
Formatting Issue[edit]
This isn't in wiki code, which is why nothing is showing up. If it was ported over from a forum, that may explain the difficulty. We do, however, have a class preload that you can copy and paste at your leisure. I also find it curious that you have other classes in proper wiki code, yet this one isn't. What's up with that? - TG Cid (talk) 06:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- You're like, totally wrong, ThunderGod Cid. It wasn't showing up because of a few missing square brackets. --Foxwarrior (talk) 06:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I accidentally deleted a couple of square brackets. Seems to be working fine now. -- Somehownotsingle (talk) 08:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- One does not simply ignore a ThunderGod ...Somehownotsingle (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Played?[edit]
I noticed a lot of hits for this class, so I was wondering if anyone has used it in a game yet. If so, I would love some feedback about what worked/didn't work, what you liked/didn't like, etc. Or, if you adopted the class (or any part of it), I would love to know that, too. Basically, I'm looking for any feedback from people who have field tested this class, or aspects of it. Thanks!Somehownotsingle (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)