Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limiting Points (3.5e Other)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
::::::This seems like it would be better as a series of Canon articles summarizing assorted resource management systems. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  23:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 
::::::This seems like it would be better as a series of Canon articles summarizing assorted resource management systems. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  23:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::::[Edit] Except for the part where it points at homebrew and includes homebrew systems. So except for all of it. But I do see value in having a summary and reference for these sorts of things (particularly when they don't have one of their own as a variant rule somewhere), even if the name is really weird. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  23:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:51, 28 August 2013

I don't get the point to this at all. --Ghostwheel (talk) 08:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

I actually agree With GW on this one. Why is this a thing? --Undead_Knave (talk) 17:19, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
I figured I'd put all the limiting point types mentioned across the wiki in one place. I already kind of did that with the enhance seed I made back on the D&D Wikia, but that's meant to be a functional article, and I wanted to have someplace to talk about limiting points without having to bury them in spell description. Plus, I want to be able to link to each of the limiting points so people can read more about them, give an in-depth summary, and offer my own two cents on them. (For instance, I unabashedly gush over Eiji-kun's combat points.) --Luigifan18 (talk) 17:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Wouldn't this be better as a sandbox thing then? I don't see this of being much use to the average wiki visitor. --Ghostwheel (talk) 17:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Maybe not right now; I'm still working on the writeup. But it can at least be useful for explaining essentia, I suppose. --Luigifan18 (talk) 19:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Or... one could read Magic of Incarnum. Still not anywhere near convinced... --Ghostwheel (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
This seems like it would be better as a series of Canon articles summarizing assorted resource management systems. - Tarkisflux Talk 23:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
[Edit] Except for the part where it points at homebrew and includes homebrew systems. So except for all of it. But I do see value in having a summary and reference for these sorts of things (particularly when they don't have one of their own as a variant rule somewhere), even if the name is really weird. - Tarkisflux Talk 23:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
LikedFranken Kesey +
UncountedRatingGhostwheel +