Difference between revisions of "Talk:Colorblind (3.5e Trait)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(→Accuracy: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I'll think of one. There is a mechanical penalty but it is ill defined. "Don't hit the red frogs! They explode!" "The what frogs?" and so forth. Your suggestion is reasonable though, I will think. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 21:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | :I'll think of one. There is a mechanical penalty but it is ill defined. "Don't hit the red frogs! They explode!" "The what frogs?" and so forth. Your suggestion is reasonable though, I will think. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 21:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Accuracy == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Although this is D&D (so the point may be moot), even the more severe forms of colorblindness still allow perception of colors. They just have 2 cones in their eyes (or 2 functioning cones at least) instead of 3. See: [http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb263953(v=vs.85).aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb263953(v=vs.85).aspx]. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] ([[User talk:Aarnott|talk]]) 17:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:51, 16 July 2013
Penalty
I'd give a small penalty that's actually mechanical for this one. Perhaps a -1 to spot, search, bluff, and diplomacy for the reasons stated in the flavor section? --Ghostwheel (talk)
- I'll think of one. There is a mechanical penalty but it is ill defined. "Don't hit the red frogs! They explode!" "The what frogs?" and so forth. Your suggestion is reasonable though, I will think. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 21:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Accuracy
Although this is D&D (so the point may be moot), even the more severe forms of colorblindness still allow perception of colors. They just have 2 cones in their eyes (or 2 functioning cones at least) instead of 3. See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb263953(v=vs.85).aspx. --Aarnott (talk) 17:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
