Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forsaker (3.5e Class)"
(→Discussion of Class: new section) |
(→Discussion of Class) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I like the look of this class, and am considering using at as the basis of an enemy NPC for the party in my game to encounter soon. They chose to be a caster-heavy party, so this should be a good "mini-boss" fight for them. However, I'm still relatively new to D&D (and DM'ing), so I'm hoping to get some discussion on this class going before I decide to use it.[[User:Somehownotsingle|Somehownotsingle]] ([[User talk:Somehownotsingle|talk]]) 04:38, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | I like the look of this class, and am considering using at as the basis of an enemy NPC for the party in my game to encounter soon. They chose to be a caster-heavy party, so this should be a good "mini-boss" fight for them. However, I'm still relatively new to D&D (and DM'ing), so I'm hoping to get some discussion on this class going before I decide to use it.[[User:Somehownotsingle|Somehownotsingle]] ([[User talk:Somehownotsingle|talk]]) 04:38, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Certainly, glad to help, and always happy to see my things in use. How shall I assist you? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 07:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:02, 18 May 2013
IP change
Hey 50.195.136.149, when making major class changes (that is anything that isn't clarity or typo fixing) it's typically requested that you leave a note on the talk page what you did and why, or try and contact the author if he's about. I reverted it as I don't feel that Con to AC and then 2x Con to AC is a good idea. Discuss it here if you feel otherwise. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 03:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Discussion of Class
I like the look of this class, and am considering using at as the basis of an enemy NPC for the party in my game to encounter soon. They chose to be a caster-heavy party, so this should be a good "mini-boss" fight for them. However, I'm still relatively new to D&D (and DM'ing), so I'm hoping to get some discussion on this class going before I decide to use it.Somehownotsingle (talk) 04:38, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Certainly, glad to help, and always happy to see my things in use. How shall I assist you? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
