Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crool (3.5e Race)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (Text replace - "== Favor ==" to "== Ratings ==") |
(updated rating) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Rating |
|rater=Ganteka Future | |rater=Ganteka Future | ||
| − | | | + | |rating=dislike |
| − | |reason=Good work. Solid and straightforward. Has enough flavor and information to implement into a campaign. Racial traits are, again, straightforward, nothing fancy, but, it gets the job done and it knows what it is designed to be (and that fits with the flavor), a big brute. I naturally worry about LA races designed for melee, but, that's just a worry, being a fault of the system, and not of the race. So yeah, again, good work | + | |reason=<s>Good work. Solid and straightforward. Has enough flavor and information to implement into a campaign. Racial traits are, again, straightforward, nothing fancy, but, it gets the job done and it knows what it is designed to be (and that fits with the flavor), a big brute. I naturally worry about LA races designed for melee, but, that's just a worry, being a fault of the system, and not of the race. So yeah, again, good work.</s> |
| + | The flavor is straightforward though not particularly entertaining, flowing well enough for understandability. The racial traits are however ''too straightforward'', offering nothing of interest to a player other than ability score adjustments. With LA tacked onto that, it makes me dislike it. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:00, 21 July 2012
Ratings
|
Ganteka Future dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. |
|---|---|
| The flavor is straightforward though not particularly entertaining, flowing well enough for understandability. The racial traits are however too straightforward, offering nothing of interest to a player other than ability score adjustments. With LA tacked onto that, it makes me dislike it. |
