Difference between revisions of "Talk:Starborn (3.5e Race)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (removed nonsensical clause) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This fits the above description to a T. In my opinion, it's quite hideous balance-wise. Flight and spell resistance, a mess of ability score adjustments, and bio-energy (tons of people use this, it seems, but I always seem to see it on races that have issues) do not add up to LA +0. All in all, it's not up to the standards we hold for races on this wiki since it's not really playable. - [[User:ThunderGod Cid|TG Cid]] 01:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | This fits the above description to a T. In my opinion, it's quite hideous balance-wise. Flight and spell resistance, a mess of ability score adjustments, and bio-energy (tons of people use this, it seems, but I always seem to see it on races that have issues) do not add up to LA +0. All in all, it's not up to the standards we hold for races on this wiki since it's not really playable. - [[User:ThunderGod Cid|TG Cid]] 01:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Furthermore, races never have an odd numbered modifier to an ability score. They are all even. --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 03:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:59, 4 January 2011
Kind of Ugly
This fits the above description to a T. In my opinion, it's quite hideous balance-wise. Flight and spell resistance, a mess of ability score adjustments, and bio-energy (tons of people use this, it seems, but I always seem to see it on races that have issues) do not add up to LA +0. All in all, it's not up to the standards we hold for races on this wiki since it's not really playable. - TG Cid 01:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Furthermore, races never have an odd numbered modifier to an ability score. They are all even. --Havvy 03:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
