Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tome of Prowess (3.5e Sourcebook)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Propertizing)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:This I can do, but I'm going to delay until I'm more conscious. Also, I want to ponder whether it makes sense to stick ToP skills in the regular property or make a new ToPSkill property. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] 07:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 
:This I can do, but I'm going to delay until I'm more conscious. Also, I want to ponder whether it makes sense to stick ToP skills in the regular property or make a new ToPSkill property. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] 07:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
::I've seen properties hold multiple roles depending on where they are used.  But since they are to be used alongside normal skills, it might make more sense to have TomeSkill.  This is a part of the Tome system, no?

Revision as of 07:51, 23 December 2010

Propertizing

Can someone who knows the wiki more than me set up a Tome of Prowess Skills property for classes to have, and maybe a block to copypasta that sets them all as class skills? Thanks, I'd appreciate having this since I want to reference this in stuff I'm writing. --IGTN 05:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

This I can do, but I'm going to delay until I'm more conscious. Also, I want to ponder whether it makes sense to stick ToP skills in the regular property or make a new ToPSkill property. - Tarkisflux 07:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I've seen properties hold multiple roles depending on where they are used. But since they are to be used alongside normal skills, it might make more sense to have TomeSkill. This is a part of the Tome system, no?
FavoredLeziad +, Undead Knave +, MisterSinister +, Wildmage +, TK-Squared + and Foxwarrior +
LikedSurgo + and DanielDraco +