Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cryomancer (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::Lay down some reviews? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 08:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | :::Lay down some reviews? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 08:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Okay fiiine. But winter cleaning would probably be more appropriate --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 17:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:54, 6 October 2024
Ratings
|
Foxwarrior opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It's unfinished, lots of abilities are poorly explained to the point of being incomplete, there's no balance point but Wisdomatic would make for an overpowered 1 level dip at High or lower and it'd be a boring class to play at Very High. |
Missing Info
You seem to have accidentally removed some important things such as the tag (the 3.5e Class) part, author box, and footer. I'll try to add it back, but try to keep it in there. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Lord, this class is missing a lot. Class feature types (e.g. Ex, Su, Sp, Ps), action costs, and save DC formulas are all missing. --Luigifan18 (talk) 15:43, 27 September 2018 (MDT)
- So uh... this should probably be deleted or something right. --Foxwarrior (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay fiiine. But winter cleaning would probably be more appropriate --Foxwarrior (talk) 17:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
