Difference between revisions of "Talk:Two-Weapon Fighter (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
m (Spelling) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Rating |rater=Sulacu | {{Rating |rater=Sulacu | ||
|rating=neutral | |rating=neutral | ||
| − | |reason=While two-weapon fighting is undoubtably useful, this is effectively trading two feats (Armor Proficiency (medium) and Armor Proficiency (heavy)) for one (Two-Weapon Fighting). Furthermore, I don't really see ignoring Dexterity requirements as very useful considering that, having relinquished the defenses of both heavy armors and shields you would have a high Dexterity bonus to offset the drop in defense in the first place. | + | |reason=While two-weapon fighting is undoubtably useful, this is effectively trading two feats (Armor Proficiency (medium) and Armor Proficiency (heavy)) for one (Two-Weapon Fighting). Furthermore, I don't really see ignoring Dexterity requirements as very useful considering that, having relinquished the defenses of both heavy armors and shields you would have a high Dexterity bonus to offset the drop in defense in the first place. Basically, I don't think this is any more effective than taking Two-Weapon Fighting as one of your fighter bonus feats. |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:26, 10 November 2015
Ratings
|
Sulacu is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| While two-weapon fighting is undoubtably useful, this is effectively trading two feats (Armor Proficiency (medium) and Armor Proficiency (heavy)) for one (Two-Weapon Fighting). Furthermore, I don't really see ignoring Dexterity requirements as very useful considering that, having relinquished the defenses of both heavy armors and shields you would have a high Dexterity bonus to offset the drop in defense in the first place. Basically, I don't think this is any more effective than taking Two-Weapon Fighting as one of your fighter bonus feats. |
