Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ranged Threat (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added rating.)
(Added rating.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=DanielDraco
 +
|rating=favor
 +
|reason=Solid feat, well balanced. Possibly some small rules holes, but they shouldn't ever actually cause problems
 +
}}
 
{{Rating |rater=Havvy
 
{{Rating |rater=Havvy
 
|rating=favor
 
|rating=favor

Revision as of 19:51, 11 October 2014

Ratings

RatedFavor.png DanielDraco favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Solid feat, well balanced. Possibly some small rules holes, but they shouldn't ever actually cause problems
RatedFavor.png Havvy favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Opens up the AoO to ranged fighting.
RatedFavor.png Eiji-kun favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Ranged threats are hard to get, this does it well.
RatedFavor.png Tarkisflux favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
The new format makes it stand out while providing a substantial ranged benefit. It was ok before, but now its both good and interesting.
RatedLike.png Foxwarrior likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
Now this actually resembles how it should work, even. The range limit being so short is a little bit strange.
Blocked
RatedNeutral.png
Rating
Surgo is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
This rating refers to a substantially different version of the article, or concerns mentioned in it have already been addressed.
This is not a bad base at all. The issue I have is that movement provokes AoOs, and that can get a bit nuts. Even Tome Point Blank Shot specifically disallows AoOs on movement.

I remember discovering, to my dismay, that each movement action only provokes one AoO. --Foxwarrior (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

FavoredHavvy +, Eiji-kun + and Tarkisflux +
LikedFoxwarrior +
UncountedRatingSurgo +