Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spew Acid (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (→Comments) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Yes, but I don't know if I went far enough. It's still less good than a greatsword hit at level 1, dealing damage of about 16 Str w/ longsword on average instead (on a failed save). Which is still mostly dead or hurting a bit on a save, and thus probably ok, but I'm still kicking around other ways for it to work that I might like better. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 23:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | :Yes, but I don't know if I went far enough. It's still less good than a greatsword hit at level 1, dealing damage of about 16 Str w/ longsword on average instead (on a failed save). Which is still mostly dead or hurting a bit on a save, and thus probably ok, but I'm still kicking around other ways for it to work that I might like better. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 23:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The question is really: "how good is a 15 foot cone as opposed to an extra 30-40 feet of charge distance?" --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 23:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:40, 6 November 2012
Ratings
|
Foxwarrior likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| As a remake of burning hands, this seems to have damage that scales at the same rate as other High-balance characters. Numerically, I approve. |
Comments
Increasing the damage by 1d6 at first level and the damage cap accordingly... You're trying to make spellcasters' damage dealing abilities actually viable at low level, are you? -HarrowedMind (talk) 22:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but I don't know if I went far enough. It's still less good than a greatsword hit at level 1, dealing damage of about 16 Str w/ longsword on average instead (on a failed save). Which is still mostly dead or hurting a bit on a save, and thus probably ok, but I'm still kicking around other ways for it to work that I might like better. - Tarkisflux Talk 23:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- The question is really: "how good is a 15 foot cone as opposed to an extra 30-40 feet of charge distance?" --Foxwarrior (talk) 23:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
