Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mindrending Blast (3.5e Invocation)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added rating.)
(Ratings: I just assumed madness was mind-affecting. Whoops.)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|rating=like
 
|rating=like
 
|reason=This is a bit abusable with Eldritch Glaive, but Glaive of Madness sound like a really really metal build.
 
|reason=This is a bit abusable with Eldritch Glaive, but Glaive of Madness sound like a really really metal build.
}}==Good==
+
}}
 +
 
 +
==Good==
  
 
I want to rate this but before I want to know if this is intended, madness isn't normally mind-affecting. So you can tots mindbreak someone with mind blank but not mindless creatures. Is it intended? --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 09:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 
I want to rate this but before I want to know if this is intended, madness isn't normally mind-affecting. So you can tots mindbreak someone with mind blank but not mindless creatures. Is it intended? --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 09:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 +
:I just assumed madness was mind-affecting. Whoops. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 14:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:59, 7 November 2015

Ratings[edit]

RatedLike.png Leziad likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
This is a bit abusable with Eldritch Glaive, but Glaive of Madness sound like a really really metal build.


Good[edit]

I want to rate this but before I want to know if this is intended, madness isn't normally mind-affecting. So you can tots mindbreak someone with mind blank but not mindless creatures. Is it intended? --Leziad (talk) 09:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

I just assumed madness was mind-affecting. Whoops. --Luigifan18 (talk) 14:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)