Difference between revisions of "Talk:Repeating Blast (3.5e Invocation)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does it make the same EXACT attack roll or use the same attack roll bonus? Cause it would suck if the first roll was a hit and you missed every time. | Does it make the same EXACT attack roll or use the same attack roll bonus? Cause it would suck if the first roll was a hit and you missed every time. | ||
| − | :Hmm, I'll need to think on that. At the moment, same roll. For sake of minimizing dice rolling which can easily stack up. It would suck if you kept missing, but on the other hand crits are super dangerous, and you can always fire another blast next round (though not in the same area). -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 13:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC) | + | :Hmm, I'll need to think on that. At the moment, same roll. For sake of minimizing dice rolling which can easily stack up. It would suck if you kept missing, but on the other hand crits are super dangerous, and you can always fire another blast next round (though not a repeater at the same target/in the same area). -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 13:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:03, 17 February 2015
Does it make the same EXACT attack roll or use the same attack roll bonus? Cause it would suck if the first roll was a hit and you missed every time.
- Hmm, I'll need to think on that. At the moment, same roll. For sake of minimizing dice rolling which can easily stack up. It would suck if you kept missing, but on the other hand crits are super dangerous, and you can always fire another blast next round (though not a repeater at the same target/in the same area). -- Eiji-kun (talk) 13:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
