Difference between revisions of "Template talk:3.5e Armor"
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (→Tinkering) |
(added a comment) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:I thought we were moving away from non-standard sized gear in the other equipment pages. Why for all of the inclusions here? - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 00:31, June 10, 2010 (UTC) | :I thought we were moving away from non-standard sized gear in the other equipment pages. Why for all of the inclusions here? - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 00:31, June 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Yeah, I really don't like the setup for it in general, but I wasn't sure what else to do with it yet. I ''do'' like having the subpages as their own "one stop shop" places, but man oh man, it does look cluttered, especially this rough. For now, since it's been like 10 months, it seems long over due to have something that works, even if it isn't pretty (though, pretty is of course the final goal, so long as it's still functional). Is there any chance we could get some proposals on a direction to take or just blurt out some ideas to get the ball rolling? --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] 00:46, June 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:46, 10 June 2010
Tinkering
So, I'm probably going to need some peer input at this point, since I can only manage this formatting stuff so far. This template is meant as a replacement for the currently not-working Template:Armor Stats template as well as being able to be usable for homebrew material as well.
I'm having a few problems with the overall look of it as well, mainly the stretching and the appearance of the smaller table above.
Other than that, it's fairly similar to the old template. There are some name changes on the parameters and more parameters to avoid all that variable defining stuff. Oh, and I added the Donning Armor section at the bottom as I figured it's kinda handy, though if people hate it, it can be removed. It would be nice if there was a space between the size cost chart part and the speed part and the donning part as well.
So, for now, this is a rough draft. Here's how it looks with filled-in parameters: EXAMPLE HERE. --Ganteka Future 23:12, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
- I thought we were moving away from non-standard sized gear in the other equipment pages. Why for all of the inclusions here? - TarkisFlux 00:31, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I really don't like the setup for it in general, but I wasn't sure what else to do with it yet. I do like having the subpages as their own "one stop shop" places, but man oh man, it does look cluttered, especially this rough. For now, since it's been like 10 months, it seems long over due to have something that works, even if it isn't pretty (though, pretty is of course the final goal, so long as it's still functional). Is there any chance we could get some proposals on a direction to take or just blurt out some ideas to get the ball rolling? --Ganteka Future 00:46, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
