Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aberration Hunter (3.5e Cleric Domain)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
ThirdEmperor (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'Um, sorry to say this but the name needs to be changed, the name aberration hunter doesn't sound very domain-like and although it would be a passable name for a domain that only …') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Um, sorry to say this but the name needs to be changed, the name aberration hunter doesn't sound very domain-like and although it would be a passable name for a domain that only granted turn/destroy undead the fact that it grants rebuke/command to evil characters is a bad idea. Why? Because when I read that the aberration hunter uses aberrations in battle I immediately began thinking of a pokemon hunter, and that's | Um, sorry to say this but the name needs to be changed, the name aberration hunter doesn't sound very domain-like and although it would be a passable name for a domain that only granted turn/destroy undead the fact that it grants rebuke/command to evil characters is a bad idea. Why? Because when I read that the aberration hunter uses aberrations in battle I immediately began thinking of a pokemon hunter, and that's | ||
not good.--[[User:ThirdEmperor|ThirdEmperor]] 04:12, October 1, 2009 (UTC) | not good.--[[User:ThirdEmperor|ThirdEmperor]] 04:12, October 1, 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Since when did your word became law? Honestly the name really doesn't matter so much as the content, which is solid. -- [[User:Jota II|Jota]] 04:42, October 1, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:42, 1 October 2009
Um, sorry to say this but the name needs to be changed, the name aberration hunter doesn't sound very domain-like and although it would be a passable name for a domain that only granted turn/destroy undead the fact that it grants rebuke/command to evil characters is a bad idea. Why? Because when I read that the aberration hunter uses aberrations in battle I immediately began thinking of a pokemon hunter, and that's not good.--ThirdEmperor 04:12, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
- Since when did your word became law? Honestly the name really doesn't matter so much as the content, which is solid. -- Jota 04:42, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
