23,111
edits
Changes
no edit summary
== Ratings ==
{{Rating |rater=The-MarksmanDragonexx
|rating=favor
|reason=This is wonderful! As the others have saidA simple, its very well balancedbut good, but still worth boost to the feat slotrage ability. Love the bonus damage, great idea!
}}
{{Rating |rater=DragonexxQwertyu63
|rating=favor
|reason=A simpleVery nice. One of the better things I've read today. Good, but not so good, boost everyone has to the rage abilitytake it. Just right.
}}
{{Rating |rater=Fluffykittens
|rating=like
|reason=A nice little straight up boost to power, but weak enough that it's merely nice and not necessary.
}}
{{Rating |rater=The-Marksman
|rating=Like
|reason=This feat keeps changing so much it's hard to keep my rating up to date. First it was too powerful because it didn't have a draw back, then it had int damage which I thought was decent, because then you had to watch when/how you used it, or use up valuable magic resources to fix the int damage. Now it lowers con, which, while that '''is''' a draw back, Barbarians have so much con already that I'm not sure they'll properly ''feel'' that penalty.
}}
{{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun
|rating=like
|reason=This is a nice high level boost to one's rage. Worth the feat slot, I approve.
}}
{{Rating |rater=SecondDeath777
|rating=like
|reason=Fair enough. Adds some options to raging, checks out nicely. No particularly strong feelings about it, but it's worth a like for being fairly made.
}}
{{Rating |rater=Leziad
|rating=likeneutral|reason=A very decent This used to be short and a nice little featthat just improved rage. Maybe it was too good for high, and a penalty was probably warranted or increasing it balance range. Now it a different type of rage, which remove your durability for more damage. I feel like the simplicity of the old feat is gone and I am pleasantly surprised by not super keen on this version.}}Alternatively, for a very small investment in gold for a wand of lesser restoration, you Keseycan use this all day long without any worries. For a shift on the RNG on top of what you normally gain from Strength, I think it's deserved. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 13:49, 14 May 2019 (MDT) {{Rating |rater=Undead Knave|rating=neutral|reason=My opinions on this feat have changed somewhat over time. It's a pretty boring vertical increase in power for Barbarians, and while the base Barb needs it, this gets out of hand quickly with more powerful Barb variants. Even for the base Barb, though, it's boring. A resounding meh.}}{{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel|rating=dislike|reason=The big part of rage is the bonus to Strength. Reducing the bonus to Constitution, even to 0, is not a huge deal at all. Regardless, this is a straight up vertical enhancement to power, which is the laziest of bonuses to give from a feat, especially when the drawback is largely immaterial.
}}
I'd call this rogue at least. +2 to attack and +3 to damage from a single feat? At least rogue-level. That, and it can be used at will, with no negative side-effects like the barbarian's race...... --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 04:24, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
::A benefit is a benefit, especially one that you get under the exact same circumstances as the rest of the benefits you list. The special section is more reserved for meta-game rules interactions, like a feat counting as another for prereq purposes or if the feat can be selected as a fighter bonus feat (which is redundant with the later introduced Fighter tag, and was dropped from later books). Anyway, I'd move that into the regular benefit line and drop the hotheaded reference in favor of "while raging" for clarity. - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 16:12, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
:::Removed intimidate boost completely. It was not the crux of the feat.--Franken Kesey 12:26, 21 May 2019 (MDT)
== Salvage ==
I've begun the salvage operation. Actually I think I've used this one before. Except for the bit where the decrease in Con and rage duration (I don't think that actually applies in the first place), nothing wrong here. If it needs adoption, I can. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 01:32, 10 July 2019 (MDT)