Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paladin, Sulacu Variant (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Undo revision 302899 by Franken Kesey (talk)) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|rating=like | |rating=like | ||
|reason=I like it, the "invocations" remind me of the Warlock class while turning the corny "smite evil" into a true Holy attack which was it's initial intention. gives the "book of exalted deeds" feeling for a class that deserves it. while taking the spellcasting out fully seperating the paladin from the Cleric. additionally it gives the paladin the opposite look of the warlock and gives great room for the "high priest" class you posted. | |reason=I like it, the "invocations" remind me of the Warlock class while turning the corny "smite evil" into a true Holy attack which was it's initial intention. gives the "book of exalted deeds" feeling for a class that deserves it. while taking the spellcasting out fully seperating the paladin from the Cleric. additionally it gives the paladin the opposite look of the warlock and gives great room for the "high priest" class you posted. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 01:21, 2 March 2019
Ratings
Snafusam likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. | |
---|---|
I like it, the "invocations" remind me of the Warlock class while turning the corny "smite evil" into a true Holy attack which was it's initial intention. gives the "book of exalted deeds" feeling for a class that deserves it. while taking the spellcasting out fully seperating the paladin from the Cleric. additionally it gives the paladin the opposite look of the warlock and gives great room for the "high priest" class you posted. |