Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kaldan (3.5e Race)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Zhenra-Khal (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|reason=Icky, weird, wonderful. They sound like they'd make wonderful Cryptics. | |reason=Icky, weird, wonderful. They sound like they'd make wonderful Cryptics. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would suggest changing ring slots to 4, same as an aboleth, unless tendrils are limited to 2 (it wasn't clear). Perhaps starting at 2 tendrils and advancing to 4 with greater HD, or as a racial paragon class perk. [[User:Elohim|Elohim]] ([[User talk:Elohim|talk]]) 09:18, 9 September 2017 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:18, 9 September 2017
Ratings
|
Zhenra-Khal favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Icky, weird, wonderful. They sound like they'd make wonderful Cryptics. |
I would suggest changing ring slots to 4, same as an aboleth, unless tendrils are limited to 2 (it wasn't clear). Perhaps starting at 2 tendrils and advancing to 4 with greater HD, or as a racial paragon class perk. Elohim (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2017 (MDT)
