Difference between revisions of "Talk:Master Biomancer (3.5e Prestige Class)"
(→Improvements.: new section) |
(Notice and removal of self-rating) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{Rating |rater=Undead Knave | {{Rating |rater=Undead Knave | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
| Line 12: | Line 8: | ||
Feel free to add ideas/concerns about the class. I'm not sure what Undead Knave is talking about fusing dazed people as from the beginning it has to be willing. Edited to avoid mind control effects though, and turned down the power for making a fusion permanent. | Feel free to add ideas/concerns about the class. I'm not sure what Undead Knave is talking about fusing dazed people as from the beginning it has to be willing. Edited to avoid mind control effects though, and turned down the power for making a fusion permanent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Notice == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Self-rating your own article is against policy. Check out that biz here: [[Dungeons and Dragons Wiki:Rating Articles]]. Secondly, welcome aboard. On the topic of getting ratings on an article, and getting ratings negatively, don't feel bad. It is, after all a point at which discussion opens, and getting feedback on an article is seriously awesome and something I wish I had more time for personally. Asking for an elaboration on why the article was rated a certain way is always helpful (those things should already be in the rating itself, but sometimes keeping things succinct for readability or other reasons causes that to fail, we're only human after all). So, you could be all like "Hey, UK, what do you mean by at level 5 with some downtime you just make any enemy part of a PC?" and I'm sure he'll notice and pop on and give an explanation as soon as he's got the time. You can always post on the talk page that you're looking for more feedback as well. That's about it for now I guess. Carry on. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] ([[User talk:Ganteka Future|talk]]) 13:39, 9 July 2017 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 9 July 2017
Ratings
|
Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| At level 5 in games that have a lot of downtime, every powerful enemy becomes a part of one of the PCs. At level 1, it's just the ones that've been charmed/coerced/etc. for 1 round. |
Improvements.
Feel free to add ideas/concerns about the class. I'm not sure what Undead Knave is talking about fusing dazed people as from the beginning it has to be willing. Edited to avoid mind control effects though, and turned down the power for making a fusion permanent.
Notice
Self-rating your own article is against policy. Check out that biz here: Dungeons and Dragons Wiki:Rating Articles. Secondly, welcome aboard. On the topic of getting ratings on an article, and getting ratings negatively, don't feel bad. It is, after all a point at which discussion opens, and getting feedback on an article is seriously awesome and something I wish I had more time for personally. Asking for an elaboration on why the article was rated a certain way is always helpful (those things should already be in the rating itself, but sometimes keeping things succinct for readability or other reasons causes that to fail, we're only human after all). So, you could be all like "Hey, UK, what do you mean by at level 5 with some downtime you just make any enemy part of a PC?" and I'm sure he'll notice and pop on and give an explanation as soon as he's got the time. You can always post on the talk page that you're looking for more feedback as well. That's about it for now I guess. Carry on. --Ganteka Future (talk) 13:39, 9 July 2017 (MDT)
