Difference between revisions of "Talk:Flowing Style Counter (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel
 +
|block=NewVersion
 +
|rating=oppose
 +
|reason=A similar feat (Robilar's Gambit) is at a much higher level, and requires a -4 penalty to AC to be taken. Furthermore, monks and similar characters often have a higher-than-average AC, meaning this feat will go off quite often. Between the two, this feels way under-balanced, or with the prerequisites being way too low.
 +
}}
 +
 +
== Discussion==
 +
 
Compare with Robilar's Gambit, I feel this comes online ''way'' too soon, and its synergy with already published material (Stormguard Warrior) is too good at low levels to be High-level. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 01:55, 28 December 2016 (MST)
 
Compare with Robilar's Gambit, I feel this comes online ''way'' too soon, and its synergy with already published material (Stormguard Warrior) is too good at low levels to be High-level. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 01:55, 28 December 2016 (MST)
  
Line 4: Line 13:
  
 
:: Yes, but this replaces Robilar's Gambit without the penalty for -4 to AC. And that's got a +12 BAB requirement. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 14:16, 28 December 2016 (MST)
 
:: Yes, but this replaces Robilar's Gambit without the penalty for -4 to AC. And that's got a +12 BAB requirement. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 14:16, 28 December 2016 (MST)
 +
 +
::: This is only if you are missed by an attack, Robilar gambit is for every attacks be it a hit or miss. This is much weaker. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 14:43, 28 December 2016 (MST)
 +
 +
:::: I think you are wrong, but I did make some changes. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 19:44, 28 December 2016 (MST)

Latest revision as of 00:12, 30 December 2016

Ratings[edit]

Blocked
RatedOppose.png
Rating
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
This rating refers to a substantially different version of the article, or concerns mentioned in it have already been addressed.
A similar feat (Robilar's Gambit) is at a much higher level, and requires a -4 penalty to AC to be taken. Furthermore, monks and similar characters often have a higher-than-average AC, meaning this feat will go off quite often. Between the two, this feels way under-balanced, or with the prerequisites being way too low.


Discussion[edit]

Compare with Robilar's Gambit, I feel this comes online way too soon, and its synergy with already published material (Stormguard Warrior) is too good at low levels to be High-level. --Ghostwheel (talk) 01:55, 28 December 2016 (MST)

Isn't Stormguard Warrior Bab +6 anyway? Something that is further slowed down with 3 levels of monk? --Leziad (talk) 13:09, 28 December 2016 (MST)
Yes, but this replaces Robilar's Gambit without the penalty for -4 to AC. And that's got a +12 BAB requirement. --Ghostwheel (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2016 (MST)
This is only if you are missed by an attack, Robilar gambit is for every attacks be it a hit or miss. This is much weaker. --Leziad (talk) 14:43, 28 December 2016 (MST)
I think you are wrong, but I did make some changes. --Leziad (talk) 19:44, 28 December 2016 (MST)