Difference between revisions of "Talk:Flowing Style Counter (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
|reason=A similar feat (Robilar's Gambit) is at a much higher level, and requires a -4 penalty to AC to be taken. Furthermore, monks and similar characters often have a higher-than-average AC, meaning this feat will go off quite often. Between the two, this feels way under-balanced, or with the prerequisites being way too low. | |reason=A similar feat (Robilar's Gambit) is at a much higher level, and requires a -4 penalty to AC to be taken. Furthermore, monks and similar characters often have a higher-than-average AC, meaning this feat will go off quite often. Between the two, this feels way under-balanced, or with the prerequisites being way too low. | ||
| − | }}Compare with Robilar's Gambit, I feel this comes online ''way'' too soon, and its synergy with already published material (Stormguard Warrior) is too good at low levels to be High-level. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 01:55, 28 December 2016 (MST) | + | }} |
| + | |||
| + | == Discussion== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Compare with Robilar's Gambit, I feel this comes online ''way'' too soon, and its synergy with already published material (Stormguard Warrior) is too good at low levels to be High-level. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 01:55, 28 December 2016 (MST) | ||
: Isn't Stormguard Warrior Bab +6 anyway? Something that is further slowed down with 3 levels of monk? --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 13:09, 28 December 2016 (MST) | : Isn't Stormguard Warrior Bab +6 anyway? Something that is further slowed down with 3 levels of monk? --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 13:09, 28 December 2016 (MST) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
::: This is only if you are missed by an attack, Robilar gambit is for every attacks be it a hit or miss. This is much weaker. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 14:43, 28 December 2016 (MST) | ::: This is only if you are missed by an attack, Robilar gambit is for every attacks be it a hit or miss. This is much weaker. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 14:43, 28 December 2016 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::: I think you are wrong. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 19:37, 28 December 2016 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 29 December 2016
Ratings
|
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A similar feat (Robilar's Gambit) is at a much higher level, and requires a -4 penalty to AC to be taken. Furthermore, monks and similar characters often have a higher-than-average AC, meaning this feat will go off quite often. Between the two, this feels way under-balanced, or with the prerequisites being way too low. |
Discussion
Compare with Robilar's Gambit, I feel this comes online way too soon, and its synergy with already published material (Stormguard Warrior) is too good at low levels to be High-level. --Ghostwheel (talk) 01:55, 28 December 2016 (MST)
- Isn't Stormguard Warrior Bab +6 anyway? Something that is further slowed down with 3 levels of monk? --Leziad (talk) 13:09, 28 December 2016 (MST)
- Yes, but this replaces Robilar's Gambit without the penalty for -4 to AC. And that's got a +12 BAB requirement. --Ghostwheel (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2016 (MST)
