Difference between revisions of "Talk:Congealing Consumption (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
| + | |rating=dislike | ||
| + | |reason=It's only slightly stronger than Glitterdust, but still; it's stronger than Glitterdust. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
|reason=It's F&K, so what can you do, but this is no 2nd level spell. F&K made some good things, but this here is just bad design. Nausea at low levels is one thing, but nausea with that duration? Nope. | |reason=It's F&K, so what can you do, but this is no 2nd level spell. F&K made some good things, but this here is just bad design. Nausea at low levels is one thing, but nausea with that duration? Nope. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:09, 4 June 2016
Ratings[edit]
|
Foxwarrior dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It's only slightly stronger than Glitterdust, but still; it's stronger than Glitterdust. |
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It's F&K, so what can you do, but this is no 2nd level spell. F&K made some good things, but this here is just bad design. Nausea at low levels is one thing, but nausea with that duration? Nope. |
