Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eldritch Flurry (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Could this feat be used with Two Weapon Fighting? I am presuming the answer is no but the possibility of this much blast raining down is too tempting not to check on. | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=Tarkisflux | ||
| + | |rating=like | ||
| + | |reason=This is a nice way to get more mileage out of the Warlock in a higher balance game (without falling back on one specific power combination). And it opens up some amusing "weapon" interactions. I likes it. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == TWF? == | ||
| + | Could this feat be used with Two Weapon Fighting? I am presuming the answer is no but the possibility of this much blast raining down is too tempting not to check on. {{unsigned|Amdillae}} | ||
:As written, all it does is make the eldritch blast an attack action. It still doesn't have the designation of a one-handed weapon or a two-handed weapon, so by my interpretation I would say that because of that lacking clause it would just be attacks from BAB and would not work with TWF. - [[User:ThunderGod Cid|TG Cid]] ([[User talk:ThunderGod Cid|talk]]) 03:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | :As written, all it does is make the eldritch blast an attack action. It still doesn't have the designation of a one-handed weapon or a two-handed weapon, so by my interpretation I would say that because of that lacking clause it would just be attacks from BAB and would not work with TWF. - [[User:ThunderGod Cid|TG Cid]] ([[User talk:ThunderGod Cid|talk]]) 03:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 15: | ||
::::I can. I'm debating on how I want to handle it now. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | ::::I can. I'm debating on how I want to handle it now. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::And done. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 06:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::: Amdillae: For the melee version, [[Furious_Blow_(3.5e_Feat)|check this out]]. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 07:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:54, 15 August 2014
Ratings[edit]
|
Tarkisflux likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| This is a nice way to get more mileage out of the Warlock in a higher balance game (without falling back on one specific power combination). And it opens up some amusing "weapon" interactions. I likes it. |
TWF?[edit]
Could this feat be used with Two Weapon Fighting? I am presuming the answer is no but the possibility of this much blast raining down is too tempting not to check on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amdillae (talk • contribs) at
- As written, all it does is make the eldritch blast an attack action. It still doesn't have the designation of a one-handed weapon or a two-handed weapon, so by my interpretation I would say that because of that lacking clause it would just be attacks from BAB and would not work with TWF. - TG Cid (talk) 03:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Technically you could, but since you don't have two eldritch blasts it would be an eldritch blast and... something else. A sling perhaps. But there's the whole lack of one or two handed weapon things which would leave it mysterious. Personally I'd go with TG Cid's vision. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Since you wrote the feat and it covers previously unconsidered ground, couldn't you just write in that "your eldritch blast is considered to be a one handed weapon, and may only be fired from your primary hand" and call it done Eiji? - Tarkisflux Talk 04:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Amdillae: For the melee version, check this out. --Ghostwheel (talk) 07:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
