Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blood of Stone (3.5e Feat)"
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (→Ratings) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
You did notice that it still lowers damage by BAB on an unsuccessful save, right? That's better than most creatures' DR (though yes, DR applies to multiple attacks). --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 19:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | You did notice that it still lowers damage by BAB on an unsuccessful save, right? That's better than most creatures' DR (though yes, DR applies to multiple attacks). --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 19:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes, I did. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 19:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott | {{Rating |rater=Aarnott | ||
Revision as of 19:17, 26 August 2013
Ratings
|
Foxwarrior is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A Fortitude save with a DC equal to damage taken is a total lifesaver at low levels, but at high levels, you're not likely to pass and almost might as well not roll. (30 damage if you've got +12 Fortitude and +10 BAB? So relevant)
Aside from those extra layers of unfortunate complication, this is a pretty decent feat. |
You did notice that it still lowers damage by BAB on an unsuccessful save, right? That's better than most creatures' DR (though yes, DR applies to multiple attacks). --Ghostwheel (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. --Foxwarrior (talk) 19:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Aarnott favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Gives you something worthwhile to do with your swift actions that also turns you into a bit of a tank.
I really like the fact that it always does something even on a failed use. DC = Damage taken means at high levels it will probably just be -BAB damage, which is cool. |
|
|
Luigifan18 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Dude, I wish I knew about this when designing the Tran trio! It's totally cool for shrugging off physical attacks. |
Other Effects
Hey Ghost, I think a specification is needed here. The description says any non-touch attack, which I infer to mean anything targeting your AC or flat-footed AC. But, as worded, it seems that area-of-effect spells as well as single-target spells can also be ignored. Is it supposed to be effective against a Cone of Cold? Quilliard 01:08, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- In D&D terminology, attacks are strictly effects that require an attack roll, so it doesn't work against those other things. --Ghostwheel 04:04, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
