Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combat Reflexes, Punishment (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
DanielDraco (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
HarrowedMind (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|reason=A bit too abusive for my tastes, but it certainly makes for an interesting counter-attacker, I'm sure. Kinda fits the whole anime-ish swordmaster. | |reason=A bit too abusive for my tastes, but it certainly makes for an interesting counter-attacker, I'm sure. Kinda fits the whole anime-ish swordmaster. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ...Yeah...You might want to limit that to two or something. If you take into account Two-Weapon Fighting, that's already four *$%*?&£ attacks on a single attack of opportunity. Robilar Gambit and Karmic Strike are powerful enough as is, I believe. Not even taking into account a rogue unleashing eight sneak attacks when it's not even his turn yet! (note that he would be pretty feat starved, though) [[User:HarrowedMind|-HarrowedMind]] ([[User talk:HarrowedMind|talk]]) 23:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:16, 27 November 2012
Ratings
|
DanielDraco dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. |
|---|---|
| More attacks on an AoO is a viable idea. A full attack is too many. |
|
Aarnott is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A bit too abusive for my tastes, but it certainly makes for an interesting counter-attacker, I'm sure. Kinda fits the whole anime-ish swordmaster. |
...Yeah...You might want to limit that to two or something. If you take into account Two-Weapon Fighting, that's already four *$%*?&£ attacks on a single attack of opportunity. Robilar Gambit and Karmic Strike are powerful enough as is, I believe. Not even taking into account a rogue unleashing eight sneak attacks when it's not even his turn yet! (note that he would be pretty feat starved, though) -HarrowedMind (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
