Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blood of Stone (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
+ | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
+ | |rating=neutral | ||
+ | |reason=A Fortitude save with a DC equal to damage taken is a total lifesaver at low levels, but at high levels, you're not likely to pass and almost might as well not roll. (30 damage if you've got +12 Fortitude and +10 BAB? So relevant) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Aside from those extra layers of unfortunate complication, this is a pretty decent feat. | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott | {{Rating |rater=Aarnott | ||
|rating=love | |rating=love |
Revision as of 19:19, 8 August 2012
Ratings
Foxwarrior is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. | |
---|---|
A Fortitude save with a DC equal to damage taken is a total lifesaver at low levels, but at high levels, you're not likely to pass and almost might as well not roll. (30 damage if you've got +12 Fortitude and +10 BAB? So relevant)
Aside from those extra layers of unfortunate complication, this is a pretty decent feat. |
Aarnott favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! | |
---|---|
Gives you something worthwhile to do with your swift actions that also turns you into a bit of a tank.
I really like the fact that it always does something even on a failed use. DC = Damage taken means at high levels it will probably just be -BAB damage, which is cool. |
Other Effects
Hey Ghost, I think a specification is needed here. The description says any non-touch attack, which I infer to mean anything targeting your AC or flat-footed AC. But, as worded, it seems that area-of-effect spells as well as single-target spells can also be ignored. Is it supposed to be effective against a Cone of Cold? Quilliard 01:08, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- In D&D terminology, attacks are strictly effects that require an attack roll, so it doesn't work against those other things. --Ghostwheel 04:04, July 16, 2010 (UTC)